Rasiklal dhariwal biography definition
Day after booking them for negligence, Pune police issues notices to 11 doctors
READ: Over 600 complaints of medical negligence pending at state council
According to the complaint, the patient was admitted to hospital on April 12, 2018, to be operated upon for his heart condition. Jagtap had advised the family that his team would go in for minimal invasive surgery instead of an open heart surgery, taking into account the young age and physique of the patient. On April 14, the surgery was performed and Sunita was informed by doctors that it was successful. However, only a few hours later, the surgeons informed her that due to some complications, they needed to perform a second surgery. After the surgery, Bhairavnath was kept in the Intensive Care Unit (on ventilator support and in a state of unconsciousness. He passed away on April 17.
Story continues below this ad
“As the patient’s wife alleged that the death was caused by negligence on part of the doctor, the post-mortem on the body was performed in camera. Also, an expert committee from the Sassoon General Hospital submitted a report to us that the death was caused by alleged negligence in dealing with the complications that occurred during the first surgery. So, we have booked 11 doctors who were involved in the surgery under Section 304 (a) of Indian Penal Code for causing death by negligence,” said Inspector Sahebrao Bhapkar of the Wanworie police station.
Jagtap, the chief cardiac surgeon and medical director at the Rasiklal Dhariwal Heartcare and Research Institute, denied charges of medical negligence and raised doubts over the conclusions of the expert committee report of Sassoon General Hospital. “We had followed all procedures, like taking informed consent from the relatives of the patient and treating the complication that does arise after any major surgery,” said Jagtap.
“He had come in a critical condition and suffered from life threatening aortic valve stenosis. A minimally invasive surgery
CBI clinched conviction of gutkha baron using testimonies of Dawood Ibrahim's relatives
Special Judge B D Shelke in Mumbai convicted the owner of Goa Gutka, J M Joshi, and D-Company gang members Jamiruddin Gulam Rasul Ansari and Farukh Mansuri under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act(MCOCA) and relevant sections of Indian Penal Code on Monday.
They were sentenced to 10 years in prison for helping the UN-designated global terrorist set up plants to manufacture gutkha, a chewable concoction of tobacco and various nuts, in Pakistan, where the D-Company is holed up.
Gutkha barons Joshi and Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal(now-deceased co-accused) had a monetary dispute following which they sought the help of Dawood Ibrahim to resolve it.
The gangster, the mastermind of the 1993 Mumbai blasts case, in turn, sought their assistance to set up gutkha manufacturing units in Pakistan to open a new source of revenue for his organised criminal gang.
The CBI filed the charge sheet in 2005 after a thorough investigation. The investigation officer examined three relatives of Dawood Ibrahim, who exposed the links between the convicts and the Dawood Ibrahim gang, D-Company operations, and monetary exchanges, among others.
During the trial, the CBI presented 44 witnesses, including Dawood's wife Mehjabeen's uncle Salim Ibrahim Sheikh and Saud Yusuf Tungetkar and Shamim Iltefat Qureishi -- brothers-in-law of Anees Ibrahim alias Chota Sheth and Dawood Ibrahim.
Their statements were vital in securing the conviction of the charge-sheeted accused, officials said.
Sheikh, in his statement to the investigation officer of the CBI, narrated how Jamiruddin Gulam Rasul Ansari alias Jumbo had forced him to carry parts of machinery to Kara
Manikchand Group
Industry group
Manikchand Group is a group of industries in India that primarily started out as a company that produced chewable tobacco products called gutka. The company sponsored the Filmfare Awards for many years.
Profile
This group was founded by Mr Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal from a small town Shirur-Ghodnadi and named after his father 'Manikchand'. It is headquartered in Pune, the Manikchand Group is a privately owned group of industries in India. It primarily started out as a company that produced chewable tobacco products called gutka in the 1960s. The group is diversified into Pan Masala, Mouth Freshner, Packaged Water (Oxyrich), Offset Printing, Wedding Cards (JRD Print pack), Flexible laminated Packaging (DIL), Electrical Switches (Xen), Flour Mills (MRFM), Construction, Water Bottle Preforms. Some of the industry products act as a front for surrogate advertising through the audio-video media channels due to strict restrictions or bans on tobacco advertising in India. Its products are exported to more than 30 countries.
The company is presently co-owned by Prakash Rasiklal Dhariwal and Janhavi Dhariwal Balan. However, the business is unofficially split as Janhavi Dhariwal Balan being the CMD of Manikchand Oxyrich and JRD Printpack while Prakash Dhariwal owning RMD (Pan Masala, Gutkha and Mouth Freshener), MR Flour Mills and Construction in the name of Dhariwal Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
References
Rasiklal Dhariwal to appears before CBI on Apr 4
As the court raised a question mark on the NBW issued against a witness in the case, Vahanvati revealed that the warrant was issued against Manickchand for the purpose of his production in a court as there were several documents which indicate his involvement in the case.
Dhariwal''s son Prakash Rasiklal Dhariwal who moved the apex court through Harish Salve Prakash challenged a Bombay High Court order refusing to stay the execution of NBW against his father.
A Bench of Justices K G Balakrishnan and Tarun Chatterjee recorded Prakash''s undertaking that his father would appear before the CBI on April 4.
The Bench also questioned as to how a NBW could be issued against Dhariwal, who till date has been shown as an witness in the case. "The warrant was issued under what provision of Criminal Procedure Code?'' asked the Bench , adding "Police has no power to issue warrants against a witness."
"This means warrants can be issued against anybody," the Bench observed and added it could only be issued if he was an accused in a case.
Vahanvati said there were certain documents which point out Manickchand''s involvement in the case.
Dhariwal and Jagdish Joshi, owners of "Manikchand gutka" and "Goa gutka" respectively, had pleaded before the court that the Mumbai Crime Branch had summoned them for questioning but they had informed police about their inability to come to India from foreign countries at this juncture as their NRI status would be disturbed.
Joshi later returned to India and agreed to face